The Metaphysics of Voudoun

12 04 2010

Maya Deren’s book, The Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti, is one of the greatest works of metaphysics of the 20th century. Unlike the works of such figures as Husserl and Heidegger, and very much like the work of Mircea Elaide, she attempts to find being in the midst of life itself, and not in pure thought. For her, Voudoun is not just some “ungodly” superstition, some manner of manipulating spirits in order to get your own way in life. The complex pantheon of deities and the rituals used to feed and invoke them are informed by a complex worldview in which all things are interconnected. The truth of being is thus not abstract, but is so concrete that it flows through the very veins of the worshippers themselves.

Deren begins her work speaking of the gros-bon-ange, the very foundation of the Haitian concept of divinity. This force lies within man and is immortal, but it is not quite like the Western concept of the soul. It is more collective than that; it carries the family history, even the history of the people, in all of its wisdom and élan. A dead person’s gros-bon-ange is collected again from the depths and put into a govi, a clay jar, in a Voudou temple. In Voudou ceremonies, such energies are channeled for the benefit of the living; those that the dead people have left behind.

Such a force also manifests itself in this life, and this is why the Voudoun priesthood is hereditary. A person can become a hougan because he has powerful gros-bon-ange: he carries his powerful ancestors in his blood. Even if a person neglects these ancestral forces, they have a way of manifesting themselves again, demanding to be served. Thus, a common retort from someone who practices Voudoun has little to do with “belief” in the Western sense. A Voudoun serviteur will often say about his faith: “I serve the loa”.

The loa are thus not the gods simply put, but ancestors that are so distant that they have been converted into archetypes. All loa were once human beings, but no loa can be remembered as an individual person. They are the ancestors so distant that they have become an abstraction; they are the energies and powers that give order to the primordial chaos. And, as I said above, they do not exist apart from people as “transcendent spirits” in the modern Judeo-Christian sense, but are “carried in the blood” and are only made manifest during possession ceremonies. In this system, it is almost as if Plato’s world of Ideas was really inhabited by the souls of the dead, reflecting transcendent principles such as love, strife, fertility, death, and so on.

Such loa have their own particular order of invocation within the pantheon and the Voudou ceremony. Above all, of course, is the Creator God who is above all, associated by most with the Christian Trinity. (As I said, Voudou ceremonies often begin with a set of Catholic prayers known as the litanies.) The supreme God, as in many African systems, is a sort of deus otiosus; he rarely intervenes in human affairs, leaving all of this to the loa. (For your information, many say that natural disasters such as earthquakes are from God, not the loa.) The first to always be invoked, however, is Legba, lord of the crossroads. Others that are commonly invoked are Ogoun, the lord of war; Erzulie, the love goddess; Damballah, the ancient sky serpent; and Loco, a rain deity.

While all of these loa are distant ancestors who have become abstractions, all still have their own characteristic traits that manifest their own “humanity”. Ghede, the lord of death, often presents himself as a vulgar trickster with a modern taste for sunglasses. Ogoun, of course, is often virile and violent, while Erzulie is fickle and demanding. Damballah, being so ancient, has little personality and speaks in a barely audible hissing. But all, through their presence, bestow blessings and wisdom. Very often, when the loa “ride” someone in a possession ceremony, they are consulted regarding problems faced either by individuals or the community. The loa are also “fed” with animal sacrifices which feed the ancestral forces at the heart of the cosmos.

One of the most moving parts of the book was Deren’s description of the ceremony for the loa of the sea, Agwe. The ceremony itself is very elaborate, and the preparation lasts for several days. It culminates in bringing a large boat loaded with offerings (sacrificed animals, baskets of vegetables and other fruits, banners, and a seven-tiered cake) to the sea. This is the banquet from which various loa, the guests of Agwe and his consort, La Sirene, will partake. It is brought out in the midst of great jubilation and cast out, and the devotees then see it sink into the ocean.

This could be a heartbreaking scene, considering the months and years it takes to compile the means to pay for this “banquet”, and the poverty that the devotees have to live with in their daily lives. Deren, however, explains all of it with great poetic acumen, recalling their song as,

a calling melody, which rose and fell in a minor key, and seemed to be borne so swiftly away on the wind that the mind’s eye saw, in swift kaleidoscope, the waters of the brilliant Mediterranean, the grey Artic, the South Pacific, and the never-seen, unknown seas everywhere, wherever they might be- with these voices borne by this melody, ruffling the waves of each of them, calling the god everywhere, over the vast reaches of his domain.

Agwe Arroyo, protect your children,
Sea-shell in hand, care for your little ones…

And perhaps that is the most perplexing part of Deren’s book for a good, monotheistic Western person. We have been trained to think that paganism in general, and Voudoun in particular, is a superstitious cult to cruel and uncaring (if not to say, demonic) forces. And perhaps the old cults of the “civilized” ancient world were like this. Zeus did not seem to care much about human beings. Perhaps no one called Baal “father” and meant it the way we do. And conceding that Voudoun was used by such unsavory characters as “Papa Doc” Duvalier to terrorize the Haitian populace, nevertheless one cannot help but be sympathetic to Deren’s portrayal of the cult to the loa.

In the same ceremony for Agwe, Deren describes a peculiar trait of the gods. When possessing a person, many of the gods weep:

It is said that the gods of the Sky Pantheon all weep. Some say it is because they first came from the waters below the earth and are still, in a sense, wet. Others say that the rains which fall are the tears of the gods; so it is because the gods weep for man out of compassion that life can go on…

The people in the boat were accustomed, now, to the fact that their great gods wept, and they accepted it, sometimes saying to them, as one would to a child, that they mustn’t weep…
Deren ends her recounting of the ceremony for the god of the sea (and thus I end my brief essay) with these words:

I turned from him to the glad faces of the others, and turned away to the sea and wept. It was at this moment that I understood why the gods, who loved these men, would weep.



9 responses

10 01 2014
Celebrate January 10 with some Voodoo | The Hegemon

[…] She then wrote a book called “The Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti,” which this defunct blog calls one of the 20th century’s great works of […]

16 10 2013
From the Prestigious League of ex-Trotskyists | Communiques of the Suburban Liberation Front

[…] been dead for centuries; the other, an innovative filmmaker who became what one could regard as the Thomas Aquinas of Voodoo, recording and codifying its rituals in her famous book on the subject, The Divine Horsemen: The […]

9 08 2012
From the Prestigious League of ex-Trotskyists | The rose in the cross

[…] been dead for centuries; the other, an innovative filmmaker who became what one could regard as the Thomas Aquinas of Voodoo, recording and codifying its rituals in her famous book on the subject, The Divine Horsemen: The […]

15 04 2010
Sam Urfer

I think Arturo was making the Elias > St. John the Baptist connection, rather than an Elias > Jesus connection.

I can dig this sort of archetypal little-i “incarnation” idea as applied to individuals, but I think that Christ does “break the mold” with the big-I Incarnation, as it were. Or perhaps rather, makes the mold from which all else springs.

I think it is important to remember that Christianity is a historical religion, even if that is made too much of these days. I read St. Bonaventure’s “Itinerarium Mentis ad Deum” recently, and it is striking that he is speaking of perennial Truth, but he grounds it in the particular experiences of himself and St. Franics. I think this relation, universal and particular, is of great importance, and we do injustice to reality when we veer too far away from either.

15 04 2010

Unfortunately, I think reading the fantastic adventures of Homer et al . in middle and high school, and having it presented as a mythology instead of a religion, has inoculated generations against observing what you have.

15 04 2010

Astute use of scripture, and far more poetic than my typically academic thinking.

But I think that we (or at least I) have to be careful here since Christ is categorically different than anyone else. While a Benedict may be AN archetype, Christ is THE archetype, otherwise we can end up with a New Age Christology.

Sure there have been similar archetypes throughout time, such as, Adam as the first ‘born’, Job as suffering servant, Moses as deliverer and law giver, etc. The Church is at least able to recognize typology, or as I like to call them pre-echos. There are also pre-echos of Christ in many of the world’s religions. This can only make sense if He is to be the One. Typology also isn’t limited to sentient beings, but also natural objects and phenomena.

This makes it easy for me to potentially lapse into Hinduism or Shinto. I have to be careful because I’m like a barn cat who’s one adventure away from reverting to a feral state.

15 04 2010
Sam Urfer

The way that the Greek gods are depicted in their interactions with human beings very much resemble these possession ceremonies, particularly in Homer and the Oracle at Delphi.

15 04 2010
Arturo Vasquez

“For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John: And if you will receive it, he is Elias that is to come. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

15 04 2010

I have seen Divine Horsemen, but I have to read Deren. The only book I have read on Voodoo was written by Alfred Métraux and it was decidedly anthropological in scope rather than metaphysical.

The loa are distant ancestors, and the saints are those who came before us.

I have long suspected that the loa, jinn, devas, kami, and aliens (read Jacques Vallée) are the same thing, and on a metaphysical level very real. Whether they’re malevolent, benevolent, or like us humans capable of both, I’m agnostic. It’s a fire that I’m too respectful to get too close to, but fascinates me endlessly.

In a similar vein, a Zen master I know taught that there is no reincarnation, since there is no ‘you’ as we know it to come back. He went on to say that the foundation of existence (people included) is a collection of conditions (archetypes if you will). It’s these conditions that incarnate.

Though not a perfect dovetailing, this helped me to reconcile reincarnation with the Church’s teaching of no reincarnation. For example, in the Tibetan tradition, Tenzin Gyatso would be the 14th incarnation (not reincarnation) of the bodhisattva (archetype) of compassion. So then, Benedict XVI could said to be the 265th incarnation of the Rock. Blasphemy, I know.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: