Text-Truth-Cosmos

25 03 2008

4evangelists1.jpg

The four Gospels are placed by Origen in relation to the four elements of the world: he sees there the four elements of which the universe of grace is constituted. “the world that God has reconciled to Himself in Christ”…  Scripture is like another world, built on the first, and if “it is a mixture of things visible and invisible”, that is because the latter is also. 

 -Henri Cardinal de Lubac, History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen

There are then two approaches to word/truth:

1. Word and truth as quantity and bits of information. Truth is something that is posessed, absolutely trascendent, and somewhat ghostly. It is abstract and very separate from the concrete. It is form extracted from matter. It is the basis of our modern approaches to metaphysics, hermeneutics, exegesis, political thought, etc.

2. Word and truth as symbolic reality (the ancient tradition): The truth is something to be assimilated, “swallowed”, and “performed” in the soul. The exterior order of the universe is meant to be absorbed into the soul so that it can reveal to the soul the order inherent inside it; the spark of divinity as St. Gregory Nanzianzen puts it. What goes on in the inner self is an expression of the order outside of oneself, and the realization ultimately arises that it is the interior beauty that is superior. Thus, the text is not something from which truth must be extracted like juice from pulp. It is rather a sign by which one’s ascent to the Divine is unlocked.

It is arguable that we don’t really understand a lot of what we read.


Actions

Information

2 responses

25 03 2008
Arturo Vasquez

I’ve cited again this quote by Pierre Hadot in the “About” section of this blog:

“We would need a very long discussion if we were seriously to approach the problem posed by the survival of Christianity in the modern world. From the point of view of my own experience, I can say that one of the great difficulties of Christianity- I’m thinking here of the textual criticism of the Bible- was what revealed to me a more general problem which could be formulated in the following terms: is modern man still able to understand the texts of antiquity, and live according to them? Has there been a definitive break between the contemporary world and ancient tradition?”

25 03 2008
Any

I can barely understand this blog let alone scripture or ancient reading so I think your post is right.

A little esoeteric in the approach to reading and knowledge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: