<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Pillars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/three-pillars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>There is a continuous attraction, beginning with God, going to the world, and ending at last with God, an attraction which returns to the same place where it began as though in a kind of circle. -Marsilio Ficino</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/three-pillars/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/?page_id=327#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your website. 
I was looking something like that. 
I love Catholicism. I love traditional Christian aesthetics. However I cannot bring myself in accord with modern Catholic or Orthodox theology. As you have noted keenly, it is not what it was during the glorious times of Raphael or Michelangelo. I think to concentrate solely on the Hebrew origins of Jesus is impoverishing and self-limiting, despite the great richness and greatness of Hebrew tradition. I think there was more to that. We need to dig more into Hellenic Jesus, Mithraic tradition, which is what you do, at least if one looks at you links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your website.<br />
I was looking something like that.<br />
I love Catholicism. I love traditional Christian aesthetics. However I cannot bring myself in accord with modern Catholic or Orthodox theology. As you have noted keenly, it is not what it was during the glorious times of Raphael or Michelangelo. I think to concentrate solely on the Hebrew origins of Jesus is impoverishing and self-limiting, despite the great richness and greatness of Hebrew tradition. I think there was more to that. We need to dig more into Hellenic Jesus, Mithraic tradition, which is what you do, at least if one looks at you links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Peter</title>
		<link>http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/three-pillars/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/?page_id=327#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>Must check out Hadot.  I am an admirer of both Aurelius and Wittgenstein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must check out Hadot.  I am an admirer of both Aurelius and Wittgenstein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
